Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0003-25    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 1/10/2025 In control: DuPage County Board
On agenda: 1/21/2025 Final action: 1/28/2025
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000061 Phillips
Attachments: 1. Z-24-000061 Phillips Cty. Bd. (01-28-2025)_Redacted.pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000061 Phillips
resolution

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 20, 2024 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Conditional Use to allow a small pier approximately one (1) inch from the interior side property line due to the location of the lake, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 27 IN BRUCE LAKE COUNTRY ESTATES UNIT ONE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, AND PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 24, 1955 AS DOCUMENT 758198, AS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 760085, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on December 4, 2024 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to allow a small pier approximately one (1) inch from the interior side property line due to the location of the lake.

B. That petitioner testified that they purchased the subject property in 2015 and have had a pier on the property since 2016.

C. That petitioner testified that they would remove the existing pier and build the proposed pier as indicated in the requested zoning relief.

D. That petitioner testified that a portion of the lake is on the southwest corner of the subject property and that the proposed pier would be stationary/ constructed at ground level in the ...

Click here for full text