Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0061-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 10/30/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 11/7/2023 Final action: 11/14/2023
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000071 Gilman
Attachments: 1. Z-23-000071 Gilman Cty. Bd. (11-14-2023)_Redacted.pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000071 Gilman
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 4, 2023, in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Conditional Use to allow the finished side of fence to face inward instead of outward toward the adjacent property, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 4 IN BLOCK 11 IN DOWNERS GROVE GARDENS, A SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 10, AND SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 7, 1924 AS DOCUMENT 177390, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on October 4, 2023, does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to allow the finished side of fence to face inward instead of outward toward the adjacent property.

B. That petitioner originally applied for a Variation for the subject zoning relief, and that the request was converted to a Conditional Use at the public hearing, as a Conditional Use is lesser zoning relief than a Variation, and that conditions can therefore be placed on the subject fence to mitigate any future impacts on adjacent properties.

C. That petitioner testified that they have requested the subject zoning relief as their fence contractor installed the subject fence incorrectly and that the wood fence that they ordered was supposed to be the same on both sides of the fence.

D. That petitioner's adjacent neighbors testi...

Click here for full text