Skip to main content
Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0024-25    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 6/11/2025 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 6/17/2025 Final action: 6/24/2025
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-25-000018 Tessel
Attachments: 1. Z-25-000018 Tessel Cty. Bd. (06-24-2025).pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-25-000018 Tessel

resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 21, 2025 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to reduce the interior side property setback for a new shed from required 10 feet to approximately 3 feet 10 inches (replacing existing shed with new shed on existing slab), on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 12 IN BLOCK 1 IN ARTHUR T. MCINTOSH AND COMPANY'S FAIRVIEW AVENUE SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORIDNG TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1923 AS DOCUMENT 169326, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on June 4, 2025 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to reduce the interior side property setback for a new shed from required 10 feet to approximately 3 feet 10 inches (replacing existing shed with new shed on existing slab).

B. That petitioner testified that he purchased the subject property in 2021 and moved in about one (1) year ago.

C. That petitioner testified that the existing shed is in a state of disrepair and that he is unable to use the existing shed for storage due to holes in the roof.

D. That petitioner testified that the existing shed is located on a 14' x 14' concrete ...

Click here for full text