Skip to main content
Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0022-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 4/12/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 4/18/2023 Final action: 4/25/2023
Title: O R D I N A N C E Zoning Petition ZONING-22-000065 Aliyeva
Attachments: 1. Z-22-000065 Aliyeva Cty. Bd. (04-25-2023)_Redacted.pdf

title
O R D I N A N C E
Zoning Petition ZONING-22-000065 Aliyeva

resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 18, 2023 and February 8, 2023 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to reduce the required lot width from required 165 feet to approximately 143.55 feet for Lot 2, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 1 IN MARIE PECA'S ASSESSMENT PLAT OF PAR TOF LOT 25 IN THE ASSESSOR'S DIVISION OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID PECA'S ASSESSMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 17, 1961 AS DOCUMENT R61-3310, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on February 8, 2023 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that they own two (2) adjacent properties (10S630 and 10S631 Garfield Avenue) and would like to divide the property at 10S630 Garfield Avenue into two (2) lots.

* That petitioner testified that he seeks the subject zoning relief to divide the subject property into two (2) new lots, with Lot 2 approximately 143.55 feet wide.

* That petitioner testified that after the proposed lot division of the subject property, they would own a total of three (3) lots.

* That petitioner testified that all three lots would be at least 100,000 sq. ft. in size and only the proposed Lot 2 would not meet the required lot width of 165 feet.

B. That petitioner testified that the subject property contains a pond with areas of...

Click here for full text