Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0047-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 9/13/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 9/19/2023 Final action: 9/26/2023
Title: O R D I N A N C E Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000050 Juraga
Attachments: 1. Z-23-000050 Juraga Cty. Bd. (09-26-2023)_Redacted.pdf

title
O R D I N A N C E
Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000050 Juraga
resolution

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 16, 2023 and August 23, 2023 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to increase the height of a fence in the interior side yard from permitted 6'6" to approximately 9'1", as existing, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 1 IN BLOCK 88 IN LIBERTY PARK SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1924 AS DOCUMENT 182542, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on August 23, 2023 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That the Zoning Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has demonstrated evidence for a Variation to increase the height of a fence in the interior side yard from permitted 6'6" to approximately 9'1", as existing.

B. That petitioner testified that the subject 9'1" fence is only located on the north side of the subject property, alongside the attached garage.

C. That petitioner testified that she installed the extension on top of the existing fence due to privacy and safety issues with neighboring/adjacent properties.

D. Tha...

Click here for full text