Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0033-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 7/17/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 8/1/2023 Final action: 8/8/2023
Title: O R D I N A N C E Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000030 Bakas
Attachments: 1. Z-23-000030 Bakas Cty. Bd. (08-08-2023).pdf

title
O R D I N A N C E
Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000030 Bakas
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 28, 2023 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 10' corner side yard setback, the property hereinafter described:

LOT 53 IN STEEPLE RUN UNIT 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 9 AND 16, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 10, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 1971 AS DOCUMENT R71-66527 AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1972 AS DOCUMENT R72-9719, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on June 28, 2023 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That the Zoning Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has demonstrated evidence for a Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 10' corner side yard setback.

B. That petitioner testified that due to the subject property's unique lot configuration and minimal backyard space, petitioner requires a privacy fence within the 10' corner side yard setback for additional privacy and security due to increased noise, vehicle, and pedestrian traffic.

C. That petitioner testified that the proposed privacy fence would be located in the last 20' of the subject property.

D. That petitioner testified that the proposed privacy fence will be an added benefit to the neighborhood and will not impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or genera...

Click here for full text