Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0052-24    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 8/13/2024 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 8/20/2024 Final action: 8/27/2024
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000035 Bagalanon (10%)
Attachments: 1. Z-24-000035 Bagalanon (10%) CTY BD (08-27-2024).pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000035 Bagalanon (10%)
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 24, 2024, in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to increase the total size of a new single-family home from permitted 2,547 sq. ft. to approximately 2,741 sq. ft. (Variation is for 194 sq. ft which is 7.6% increase), on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 16 IN BLOCK 13 IN GARY AVENUE GARDENS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 10 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 8, 1927, AS DOCUMENT 237266, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on July 24, 2024 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to increase the total size of a new single-family home from permitted 2,547 sq. ft. to approximately 2,741 sq. ft. (Variation is for 194 sq. ft which is 7.6% increase).

B. That petitioner testified that the while the subject property is a separate parcel and has always been a separate parcel since the subdivision of the neighborhood was created, it was previously considered part of the adjacent lot/address, which is also owned by the petitioner's family and contains an existing house.

a. That petitioner testified that the subject property previously contained the adjacent home's garage and that the garage was recently demolished, leaving the subject property vacant and buildable as for a separate single-family home.

b. That petitioner testifi...

Click here for full text