Legislation Details

File #: DC-O-0018-26    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Approved at Committee
File created: 6/8/2026 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 6/16/2026 Final action:
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-26-000011 Elliott
Attachments: 1. Z-26-000011 Elliott Cty. Bd. (06-23-2026)

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-26-000011 Elliott
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 6, 2026 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Conditional Use to allow an existing pool and pool equipment to remain less than 10 feet from the rear property line (approximately 1 foot) where the pool has existed for at least 5 year, on the property hereinafter described:

THE NORTH 18.00 FEET OF LOT 21, AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST AND WEST LINES OF SAID LOT, ALL OF LOT 22 AND THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 23, AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST AND WEST LINES SAID LOT, ALL IN BLOCK 9, IN NORDIC PARK, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 10, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED DECEMBER 6, 1928, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 270732, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on May 20, 2026 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is for a Conditional Use to allow an existing pool and pool equipment to remain less than 10 feet from the rear property line (approximately 1 foot) where the pool has existed for at least 5 years.

B. That petitioner testified that they purchased the subject property in 1993 and installed an above-ground pool on the property approximately thirty (30) years ago.

C. That petitioner testified that they are unable to move the subject above-ground pool as in doing so would destroy the pool in the proc...

Click here for full text