Skip to main content
Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0049-25    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Referred
File created: 10/3/2025 In control: DuPage County Board
On agenda: 11/25/2025 Final action: 11/25/2025
Title: ZONING-25-000059 – Fittanto: To approve the following zoning relief: Variation to allow a recreational vehicle (vintage Airstream RV) in front of the front wall. (Milton / District 4) ZHO Recommendation to Deny. Development Committee VOTE (Motion to Approve Failed): 0 Ayes, 5 Nays, 1 Absent (If the County Board seeks to approve the zoning relief it will require a ¾ majority vote {14 votes} to approve based on the recommendation to deny by the Zoning Hearing Officer)
Attachments: 1. ZONING-25-000059 Fittanto Cty Bd Flyer_Redacted

Zoning Petition ZONING-25-000059 Fittanto


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 15, 2025, in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to allow a recreational vehicle (vintage Airstream RV) in front of the front wall.

on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 4, BLOCK 2 IN MC INTOSH BROTHERS, INC., GLEN ELLYN WOODS A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, T-39-N, R-10-E OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on November 5, 2025 does find as follows:


FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that they seek to keep the existing RV located in front of the front wall of the home on the property. The petitioner would like to keep the RV for traveling purposes in the future.

B. That petitioner testified that the RV is unable to be located on either side of the home due to one side being a stormwater drain and the other side not having enough space.

C. That petitioner testified that the RV does not impact the ability to access the driveway or the garage on the property.

D. That petitioner testified that the RV is not a safety concern. That petitioner testified that they have spoken to multiple neighbors who do not have an issue with the request.

E. That the Zoning Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has not demonstrated sufficient evidence for a practical difficulty or particular hardship in relation to the subject zoning relief for a Variation for a recreational vehicle (vintage Airstream RV) ...

Click here for full text