Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0069-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 11/13/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 11/21/2023 Final action: 11/28/2023
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000080 Adams
Attachments: 1. Z-23-000080 Adams Dev. Com. (11-21-2023).pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000080 Adams

resolution

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 1, 2023, in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to reduce the interior side setback from required 3' to approximately 0' for repaving driveway with asphalt parking space, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 1 IN BLOCK 22 IN THE THIRD ADDITION TO THE NORTHWEST ADDITION TO WHEATON, A SUBDIVISION IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 10, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACORRDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 23, 1926, AS DOCUMENT 210111, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on November 1, 2023, does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the proposed zoning relief is to reduce the interior side setback from required 3' to approximately 0' for repaving an existing driveway with asphalt parking space.

B. That petitioner testified that he is replacing his existing driveway with a new asphalt driveway and that the last fifteen (15) feet of the driveway is considered a parking space which is required to be at least three (3) feet from the interior side property line.

C. That petitioner testified that the subject driveway is pre-existing and that no new parking areas are proposed.

D. That the Zoning Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has demonstrated sufficient evidence for a practical difficulty and unique circumstance for the proposed driveway, as the subj...

Click here for full text