Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0053-24    Version:
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 8/13/2024 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 8/20/2024 Final action: 8/27/2024
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000040 Jimenez
Attachments: 1. Z-24-000040 Jimenez CTY BD (08-27-2024).pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000040 Jimenez
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 24, 2024, in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

1. Variation to reduce the west interior side setback from required 20 feet to approximately 13 feet for a house addition.
2. Variation to reduce the east interior side setback from required 20 feet to approximately 10 feet for a house addition, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 44 IN PRINCE CROSSING FARMS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1927 AS DOCUMENT 247293, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on July 24, 2024, does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to reduce the west and east interior side setbacks for a house addition.

B. That petitioner testified that the subject property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential, which requires twenty (20) foot side yard setbacks, and that the existing home was built less than twenty (20) feet from the interior side property lines.

C. That petitioner testified that the existing home was built on an angle, and that zoning relief would be required in order to build an addition on the subject home due to the existing layout of the subject property.

D. That petitioner testified that they have lived at the subject prope...

Click here for full text