Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0045-23    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 9/13/2023 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 9/19/2023 Final action: 9/26/2023
Title: O R D I N A N C E Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000045 Biegun
Attachments: 1. Z-23-000045 Biegun Cty. Bd. (09-26-2023)_Redacted.pdf

title
O R D I N A N C E
Zoning Petition ZONING-23-000045 Biegun
resolution

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 16, 2023 and August 23, 2023 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 30' front yard setback, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 2 IN 99TH STREET PLAT OF SURVEY OF THE NORTH 270 FEET OF THE EAST 840 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, 1954 AS DOCUMENT 735605, IN DUAPGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on August 23, 2023, does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That the Zoning Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has demonstrated evidence for a Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 30' front yard setback.

B. That petitioner testified that the fence is existing and that it was installed prior to when he purchased the subject property.

C. That petitioner testified that he requires a 6'/100% closed privacy fence within the 30' front yard setback due to increased noise and vehicle traffic on Lemont Road.

a. Furthermore, that petitioner testified that his property is lower in elevation/grade compared to Lemont Road and that the fence does not impair the line-of-sight on Lemont Road or neighboring streets and properties.

D. That Hearing Officer finds that petitioner has demonstrated that a...

Click here for full text