421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD  
WHEATON, IL 60187  
DU PAGE COUNTY  
ETSB - Emergency Telephone System  
Board  
Final Summary  
Wednesday, February 11, 2026  
9:00 AM  
Room 3500B  
Join Zoom Meeting  
Meeting ID: 861 3215 3490  
Passcode: 853514  
1.  
2.  
CALL TO ORDER  
9:00 AM meeting was called to order by Chair Schwarze at 9:00 AM.  
ROLL CALL  
ETSB STAFF:  
Linda Zerwin  
Nate Krause  
Gregg Taormina  
Eve Kraus  
Andres Gonzalez  
Prithvi Bhatt (Remote)  
COUNTY CLERK:  
Chad Pierce, Deputy Clerk  
STATE'S ATTORNEY:  
Mark Winistorfer  
ATTENDEES:  
Eric Burmeister, ACDC  
Nick Kottmeyer, County Board Office  
Nancy Llaneta, County Finance  
Roy Selvik, Addison PD  
Jan Barbeau, State’s Attorney’s Office (Remote)  
Rachel Bata, Roselle PD (Remote)  
Tyler Benjamin, DU-COMM (Remote)  
Sam Bonilla, Warrenville PD (Remote)  
Ric Ciszewski, West Chicago Fire (Remote)  
James Grabowski, City Of Elmhurst (Remote)  
Joe Grage, Lombard PD (Remote)  
Jeffery Keefe, West Chicago Fire (Remote)  
Suzette Quintell, DMMC (Remote)  
Clara Maney, DMMC (Remote)  
Erik Maplethorpe, DU-COMM (Remote)  
Anthony McPhearson, County CIO (Remote)  
Greg Milos, Bartlett PD (Remote)  
Bret Mowery, York Center Fire (Remote)Benny Ranallo, Lombard PD (Remote)  
Richard Sanborn Jr., York Center Fire (Remote)  
Larry Vacala, Downers Grove PD (Remote)  
City Of Elmhurst, (Remote)  
On roll call, Members Schwarze, Franz, Eckhoff, Hernandez, Honig, Johl, Maranowicz,  
McCarthy, Schar, and Wolber were present. Member Markay and Member Robb were absent  
Franz, Eckhoff, Hernandez, Honig, Johl, McCarthy, McCarthy,  
Schar, Schwarze, Maranowicz, Wolber, McCarthy, and McCarthy  
PRESENT  
Markay, and Robb  
ABSENT  
3.  
4.  
PUBLIC COMMENT  
There was no public comment.  
CHAIR'S REMARKS - CHAIR SCHWARZE  
Chair Schwarze stated that he had several congratulations and recognitions to share. He  
congratulated ACDC Tech Keith Marc, who was recently recognized by the Bloomingdale Police  
Department for his dedication, professionalism, and continued commitment to public safety.  
Chair Schwarze then congratulated ACDC TC Taylor Hawkins on completing the  
Communications Training Officer certification. He also recognized service anniversaries,  
congratulating DU-COMM TC George Satala on 25 years of service as a telecommunicator and  
DU-COMM TC Jackie Osborne on 30 years of service as a telecommunicator and thanked them  
for their service. Chair Schwarze reminded Members that an Executive Session would follow  
and asked them to stay. He wished everyone a happy 2-1-1 Day.  
5.  
6.  
MEMBERS' REMARKS  
There were no Members' remarks.  
CONSENT AGENDA  
Chair Schwarze asked for a motion to combine Consent Agenda Items A/Monthly Report for  
February 11; B/Minutes Approval Policy Advisory Committee for January 5, 2026; C/Minutes  
Approval ETS Board for January 14, 2026; D/ISP 9-1-1 Annual Financial Report. Member Johl  
motioned, seconded by Member Maranowicz. On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion  
carried.  
Chair Schwarze asked for a motion to approve Consent Agenda Items A/Monthly Report for  
February 11; B/Minutes Approval Policy Advisory Committee for January 5, 2026; C/Minutes  
Approval ETS Board for January 14, 2026; D/ISP 9-1-1 Annual Financial Report. Member Johl  
motioned, seconded by Member Wolber. On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion  
carried.  
6.A. Monthly Staff Report  
6.A.1.  
Monthly Report for February 11 Regular Meeting  
Attachments:  
6.B. Minutes Approval Policy Advisory Committee  
6.B.1.  
ETSB PAC Minutes - Regular Meeting - Monday, January 5, 2026  
Attachments:  
6.C. Minutes Approval ETS Board  
6.C.1.  
ETSB Minutes - Regular Meeting - Wednesday, January 14, 2026  
Attachments:  
6.D. ISP 9-1-1 Annual Financial Report  
6.D.1.  
Statewide 9-1-1 Annual Financial Report for DuPage ETSB  
Attachments:  
APPROVED THE CONSENT AGENDA  
Marilu Hernandez  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
Franz, Eckhoff, Hernandez, Honig, Johl, McCarthy, Schar,  
Schwarze, Maranowicz, Wolber, and McCarthy  
Markay, and Robb  
ABSENT:  
7.  
VOTE REQUIRED BY ETS BOARD  
7.A. Payment of Claims  
7.A.1.  
Payment of Claims for February 11, 2026 for FY25 - Total for 4000-5820 (Equalization):  
$135,913.54.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Kyle Wolber  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
7.A.2.  
Payment of Claims for February 11, 2026 for FY26 - Total for 4000-5820 (Equalization):  
$338,943.19.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.B. Purchase Resolutions  
7.B.1.  
Recommendation for the approval of a purchase order to Dick Buss & Associates LLC,  
PO 926008, for a three (3) year renewal of semi-annual Xtreme console cleaning services  
at the Addison Consolidated Dispatch Center (ACDC) and DU-COMM PSAPs, for the  
period of March 10, 2026 through March 9, 2029, Semi-annual cost of $20,000.00, for a  
total amount not to exceed $120,000.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.B.2.  
Recommendation for the approval of a contract to Facility Gateway Corporation, PO  
926010, to provide uninterrupted power supply (UPS) preventive maintenance and  
on-call emergency repair service as needed, for Facilities Management and the  
Emergency Telephone System Board (ETSB), for the period of April 1, 2026 through  
March 31, 2027, for a total contract amount not to exceed $36,317.72; per renewal option  
under bid #23-031-FM. Second option to renew. ($30,317.72 for Facilities Management  
and $6,000 for ETSB)  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
RESULT:  
Kyle Wolber  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.B.3.  
Recommendation for the approval of a purchase order to Midwest Office Interiors Inc.,  
PO 926002, for office furniture for ETSB offices to support FY26 approved headcount  
and newly filled positions, for a total amount not to exceed $16,048.16; pursuant to the  
Governmental Joint Purchasing Act, 30 ILCS 525/2 (OMNIA Contract Code R240102).  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Marilu Hernandez  
SECONDER:  
7.B.4.  
Recommendation for the approval of a contract purchase order to Rave Mobile Safety PO  
926009, to provide one (1) year of Smart911 services, for the period of April 1, 2026  
through March 31, 2027, for an amount of $119,300; per renewal option under PO  
7591-1, first of four options to renew.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
RESULT:  
Kyle Wolber  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.C. Change Orders  
7.C.1.  
ETS-R-0046I-22 - Amendment to Resolution ETS-R-0046-22, issued to AT&T, Inc. PO  
922020/5866-1, to extend the the Switched Ethernet (ASE) service for the ACDC and  
DU-COMM PSAPs for twelve (12) months, to encumber additional funds in the amount  
of $15,000.00, resulting in an amended contract total of $5,484,971.10, an increase of  
0.27%.  
A motion was made by Member Johl, seconded by Member Maranowicz, to approve this  
item. Chair Schwarze opened the item for discussion. Vice Chair Franz asked what  
overall period of time the contract covered, noting the change order was for 12 months.  
Executive Director Zerwin responded that the contract had been in place for about five  
years. On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Marilu Hernandez  
SECONDER:  
7.C.2.  
ETS-R-0029D-24 - Amendment to Resolution ETS-R-0029-24, issued to AT&T, Inc. PO  
924015/7009-1 to encumber additional funds in the County Finance software in the  
amount of $185,000, resulting in an amended contract total of $530,000, an increase of  
53.62%.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.C.3.  
ETS-R-0019A-25 - Amendment to Resolution ETS-R-0019-25, issued to CDW  
Government LLC, PO 925011/7633-1 to procure an additional 50 service hours, for a  
total of 160 hours, to complete a Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment in lieu of unused  
retainer hours, and to extend the contract expiration date, for a total amount of  
$22,437.50, resulting in an amended contract total of $73,917.50 an increase of 43.58%.  
A motion was made by Member Wolber, seconded by Member Johl, to approve this item.  
On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion carried.  
Following the vote, Vice Chair Franz raised a point of order and requested to return to  
Item 7.C.2 for clarification regarding the reference to the County finance software.  
Executive Director Zerwin explained that, as a utility, it is not a contract in the traditional  
sense; however, the County’s finance system requires funds to be encumbered to pay the  
bills, and the term and encumbrance amount must be periodically extended or increased  
in the system. Vice Chair Franz asked what the funds were for and Ms. Kraus responded  
that the item related to the Session Initiated Protocol (SIP) lines, noting there are multiple  
components within the AT&T services for the Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) and  
that two SIP lines are currently running concurrently, with one expected to drop off in the  
future. Vice Chair Franz stated he had misread the item and thanked staff for the  
clarification.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Kyle Wolber  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
7.C.4.  
Resolution to decrease and close the following contracts that have a remaining balance of  
over $10,000 and have expired: Motorola Solutions, Inc.PO 7460-1 Change Order #1;  
AT&T, Inc. PO 5164-1 Change Order #4; Rave Mobile Safety PO 4375-1 Change Order  
#1; Motorola PO 2757-1 Change Order #5.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Kyle Wolber  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
7.D. Resolutions  
7.D.1.  
Resolution declaring equipment, inventory, and/or property on Attachment A, purchased  
by the Emergency Telephone System Board of DuPage County, as surplus equipment.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.D.2.  
Resolution approving the sale of inventory from the County of DuPage on behalf of the  
Emergency Telephone System Board of DuPage County to the Toulon Fire Department  
for an amount of $4,000.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Marilu Hernandez  
SECONDER:  
7.D.3.  
Resolution approving the sale of inventory from the County of DuPage on behalf of the  
Emergency Telephone System Board of DuPage County to the Crete Emergency  
Management Agency for an amount of $500.  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
RESULT:  
APPROVED  
Pat Johl  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
7.D.4.  
Resolution approving a mutual termination agreement between the County of DuPage, on  
behalf of the Emergency Telephone System Board of DuPage County, and the Village of  
Downers Grove.  
A motion was made by Member Maranowicz, seconded by Member Johl, to approve this  
item. Chair Schwarze opened the item for discussion.  
Vice Chair Franz commented that representatives from the Village of Downers Grove  
presented at the last meeting of the Police Records Management System (PRMS)  
Oversight Committee and said he appreciated how they approached the matter, including  
taking responsibility for another agreement and sharing their experience. He thanked  
them for their support and collaboration. Chair Schwarze asked for any additional  
discussion and called for a roll call vote.  
On roll call, 10 Members voted “Aye,” 0 Members voted “Nay,” and 2 Members were  
absent; the motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
Joseph Maranowicz  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Franz, Eckhoff, Hernandez, Honig, Johl, McCarthy, Schar,  
Schwarze, Maranowicz, Wolber, and McCarthy  
Markay, and Robb  
ABSENT:  
7.D.5.  
Resolution to approve Policy 911-010.1: 54199 Capital Contingencies.  
A motion was made by Member Johl, seconded by Member Wolber, to approve this item.  
Chair Schwarze opened the item for discussion.  
Executive Director Zerwin stated the item was somewhat out of order because the Board  
had a standing Finance and Revenue section, but noted it was presented as an action item  
if it were to move forward. She explained there was an existing policy, 911-003 since  
2016 and said that when the Board transitioned from reserve language to capital  
contingencies, the policy should have been amended at that time. Executive Director  
Zerwin stated staff recommended renumbering the policy as 911-010.1 to bring the  
finance policies under one heading, and the policy was updated to be consistent with  
current practice. She explained that language from the original policy that still applied  
was retained, and language was added regarding how capital contingencies are managed  
under 54199. Staff cleaned up the document by striking practices that no longer applied,  
adding ordinance references consistent with how the Board is governed, and revising  
definitions to reflect current capital contingency terminology. She noted the 54199 chart  
had been simplified to more clearly illustrate what capital equipment the ETSB owns and  
what funds need to be set aside for future replacement, referring to it as the Capital  
Management Plan.  
Executive Director Zerwin explained the policy language was adjusted to reflect that  
54199 is a budget line item used to transfer funds when ready to pay a bill tied to a  
completed contract or milestone, and stated the capital management plan would be  
reviewed annually as part of Finance and Revenue, with items added and removed as  
appropriate.  
Chair Schwarze stated he was not opposed to tabling the item until the next meeting if the  
Board wanted more time to focus on it. Member Eckhoff said he understood a major  
point was the cost divided by projected usable life and asked whether that remained the  
same. Executive Director Zerwin confirmed it did. Member Eckhoff asked whether the  
rest was primarily updating the language and Executive Director Zerwin said yes. She  
explained the intent was to have money available at the end of the time period to replace  
equipment or extend usable life. She added that, because (911) surcharge revenues are  
finite, capital contingency appropriations are based on what is needed and formed by  
initial contract pricing, noting values could be plus or minus depending on the type of  
system.  
Vice Chair Franz stated he had questions and said he was confused because he appeared  
to have two different documents. He referenced language he read regarding radio  
replacement and said he did not see it in the version on the screen, then clarified he was  
looking at the memorandum from the packet, not the policy itself. Vice Chair Franz asked  
what the memorandum meant when stating the Board at the time decided it would not set  
aside money for radio replacement in the future. He asked how that “lessens the burden  
on the fund” but “does not decrease the earmark of funds toward replacement.” Executive  
Director Zerwin responded that the intent was that the sentence did not change what  
would be needed for replacement overall, and referenced the totals shown on the chart,  
explaining that if radios were included, the total need would be significantly higher. Vice  
Chair Franz said that if the Board decided it was not going to replace radios, he  
questioned why the memorandum would reference it, and stated he believed the  
memorandum wording was inconsistent. Executive Director Zerwin stated the intent was  
that the broader capital management plan needs remained, and clarified that  
“appropriation” may have been a more appropriate term than “earmark.”  
Vice Chair Franz stated the item should not be acted on that day, noting it was the first  
time the Board was seeing it and said it was a significant change. He said he did not  
understand the need for the change and asked how the Board is supposed to know what  
the policies are and how many policies exist. Executive Director Zerwin responded there  
were roughly 40 policies. Vice Chair Franz asked whether legal had reviewed the policy  
and noted the agenda listed it for action, not discussion only. Executive Director Zerwin  
responded that the version was sent for discussion and stated the Board typically  
discusses items and may table them, with a vote occurring at a subsequent meeting. Vice  
Chair Franz said the background read more like a narrative than a policy and asked  
whether the policy had been shared with the PSAP Directors in advance. Executive  
Director Zerwin responded that not everyone attended the PSAP Directors meeting the  
prior Friday.  
Vice Chair Franz stated this demonstrated a process issue and said policies should not be  
developed without sharing them with PSAPs, including allowing time for PSAP legal  
review and ensuring alignment with other policies. He stated he had more questions than  
answers and wanted PSAP input because the Board would be binding PSAPs regarding  
equipment replacement and said a more collaborative vetting process was needed.  
Executive Director Zerwin reiterated that the underlying policy had been in place since  
2016 as 911-003 and said the revisions were intended to make it consistent with capital  
contingencies, with redline changes primarily reflecting the shift from reserve language.  
Vice Chair Franz stated that policy changes should follow the Board’s planned Finance  
and Revenue discussion later in the meeting and the Board’s direction, rather than being  
brought for action first, and reiterated concerns about lack of advance PSAP and legal  
review. Chair Schwarze stated the Board was having the discussion and said he was  
willing to table the item and bring it back at the next meeting to allow more opportunity  
for review. Vice Chair Franz stated the Board should direct staff on future policy  
development and suggested providing PSAPs time to review and provide feedback before  
presenting a final policy revision.  
Member Maranowicz stated he agreed to table the item but said he did not believe every  
policy needed to go to the PSAPs for collaboration, noting that if ACDC and DU-COMM  
did not agree, the Board would decide. He emphasized it is the Board that makes  
decisions for the PSAPs. Chair Schwarze stated the Board is the decision maker and that  
PSAPs sit on the Board, receive the same information as other Members, and have the  
same opportunity to review, ask questions, and provide input. He stated he was agreeable  
to tabling the item and bringing it back the next month to allow additional time for PSAP  
and Board review and reiterated that the final decision rests with the Board.  
Member Schar stated that some policy changes are insignificant and made to keep  
language relevant, while others, such as this item, have broader potential implications. He  
stated this was why the Board can table an item to allow for more time and input.  
Member Schar said he supported tabling the item and felt the process was working as  
intended.  
Vice Chair Franz stated he had been watching the process for 15 years and said the Board  
needs to shift its paradigm, noting that while the Board makes the final decisions, it “does  
not run the show.” He stated there was no reason the Executive Director could not meet  
with PSAPs regularly and bring policies forward well in advance to obtain meaningful  
input. He said PSAPs receive the packet late in the week while operating dispatch centers  
and are then expected to react to items they may be seeing for the first time, which he  
said was not an effective way to operate. He stated PSAPs should be given time to review  
and provide feedback, and said staff should want that feedback because it would result in  
better policies informed by operational challenges. He said the current approach is  
backwards and stated PSAPs need flexibility to run their operations and need the support  
of the ETSB.  
A motion was made by Vice Chair Franz, seconded by Member Maranowicz, to table this  
item to a date certain, which is the March 11, 2026 ETS Board meeting. Chair Schwarze  
asked for a roll call vote. On roll call, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
TABLED  
RESULT:  
Mark Franz  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
8.  
DEDIR SYSTEM UPDATE  
Chief Selvik said the ETSB was nearing completion of the “first touch encryption” process for  
police radios, with four agencies remaining, and said the work was moving quickly. He said the  
Police Focus Group planned to meet at the end of the month and stated the group was continuing  
to move forward on Command Central Aware. He said ETSB staff were invited to the upcoming  
meeting and stated Sergeant Jim Dexter from the Lisle Police Department, who heads the  
MERIT SWAT team, would be brought in to assist with MERIT layers.  
Chief Selvik said ETSB staff, Ms. Jager from Motorola, and Mr. Nebl attended the DuPage  
Chiefs meeting on January 22 and provided information to the Chiefs, he said it was a positive  
sign that there were no questions raised publicly. He stated there had also been discussion at the  
PAC regarding requests for DuPage County statewide TAC channels, noting the channels are  
encrypted and the PAC was hesitant to release them outside the County. He stated the purpose of  
the request was for an agency to monitor during saturation nights outside the County and said the  
agency already has access through current patching but had reported difficulty monitoring. He  
said Mr. Nebl from OHSEM was working directly with the requesting agency, including  
ensuring they are included in email distribution and able to monitor over the patch, to avoid  
releasing County TAC channels. Chief Selvik asked if there were any questions and, hearing  
none, thanked everyone.  
9.  
DU PAGE ETSB 9-1-1 SYSTEM DESIGN  
Executive Director Zerwin provided a legislative update and stated the monthly report included  
two bills being tracked: Senate Bill 2670 and House Bill 4066. She said the bills were  
substantially the same, with identical language in different chambers. She noted HB 4066 was in  
Rules, and said it was unusual that the statewide surcharge language in SB 2670 was in Revenue.  
She stated she spoke with the County lobbyist, Chip Hume, who was conducting additional  
research, and noted the Associations had prepared a one-sheet for Springfield. She said staff  
would continue monitoring whether the bills gained momentum before or after the election and  
said the Board would be kept informed. She added that flyers and related materials would be  
provided so Members could assist, and noted the lobbyists were engaged and discussing strategy  
with senators.  
Vice Chair Franz asked whether the ETSB had a position or statement. Executive Director  
Zerwin responded that this has been discussed by the Board before and she certain they wanted  
the money. She reiterated staff would monitor how the legislation moved and that the County  
lobbyists were informed. Vice Chair Franz stated that he and Member Maranowicz attended a  
DMMC board meeting where the bills were discussed and said there were questions and negative  
comments from some mayors about the need for additional funding. He said the ETSB should  
have a position, noted DU-COMM had shared a position at that meeting, and asked that a  
position statement be drafted and brought back for the next meeting. Executive Director Zerwin  
stated she would like to review the DU-COMM position statement, and said staff could do so.  
Vice Chair Franz handed Executive Director Zerwin a copy of the INENA/IAPCO one sheet for  
legislators referenced in her earlier statement and an email from Director Robb to DU-COMM  
members asking for support of the two bills.  
Member Maranowicz added that, at the DMMC meeting, the board voted to support a unified  
position of support, with only one dissenting vote. Chair Schwarze stated that if the Board was  
going to have the discussion, all Members would need to come back with the position of the  
entities they represent and indicate whether they were on board or not on board.  
10.  
FINANCE AND REVENUE  
A motion was made by Member Johl, seconded by Member Maranowicz, to receive and place on  
file the Finance and Revenue items. Chair Schwarze opened the items for discussion and turned  
the floor over to Executive Director Zerwin.  
Executive Director Zerwin stated the first two items were the regular revenue reports, noting they  
were previously included in the revenue report and had been part of the Consent Agenda, and  
that the budget detail is also reflected in the payment of claims. She stated the significant new  
addition for discussion was the cleaned-up Capital Contingency Management Plan form, which  
she said shows purchase order number, the value at the time of purchase, and the annual  
amortization/savings amount. She stated the form reflects what is held in the capital contingency  
and is intended to show what is being funded and what has been appropriated, and said she added  
two lines at the bottom for discussion to show what would be needed if radios were included.  
She stated the form lists what is currently in capital contingency and explained the policy  
contemplates Board decisions on whether a purchase is placed into capital contingencies and  
whether annual saving begins or whether the fund balance is sufficient at the time. She stated the  
plan also supports discussion about removing items if they are no longer being done, or making  
funding decisions if revenues decline.  
Vice Chair Franz asked whether all radios had been paid. Executive Director Zerwin responded,  
stating radios were largely paid but agencies continue to submit requests, including requests tied  
to headcount approvals not previously reported. She noted additional radios would come out of  
new capital rather than capital contingencies because they were not budgeted for that year.  
Member Johl asked whether additional radios after headcount finalization would require  
reimbursement from the agency. Vice Chair Franz asked when the cutoff would be. Executive  
Director Zerwin stated that was a question the Board would need to answer. She explained that,  
for this project, agencies were asked to report headcount or fleet increases in advance so ETSB  
could account for replacements, and she described how the radio cache has been used to support  
replacements for broken radios and special events, with the cache being drawn down over time.  
Vice Chair Franz asked what was done in the past when agencies increased staffing or added a  
new fire apparatus. Executive Director Zerwin explained those additions were taken out of the  
cache. Chair Schwarze asked what the cache number was. Executive Director Zerwin stated it  
was originally 60 of each for APX7000s (police and fire), and said it was currently around 40 to  
50 for APXNext. Vice Chair Franz commented that policy would be needed to avoid a “run on  
the bank” at the end.  
Chair Schwarze asked about the replacement cost estimates on the chart and noted costs change  
over time. Executive Director Zerwin stated the chart reflects what was spent, not future cost,  
and said assumptions would depend on factors such as future vendor/contracting and  
discounting, noting the prior purchase received a discount. She stated one benefit of the current  
approach is that funds are appropriated and generally paid over milestones rather than in a single  
lump sum, allowing the fund to withstand major replacements, and said the approach helps  
manage stress on the fund as systems are staggered but not always perfectly aligned. She stated it  
remains difficult to predict future costs, and noted that for items such as Fire Station Alerting,  
ETSB funds core components while agencies reimburse ETSB for optional equipment.  
Chair Schwarze stated that maintaining approximately $34M in capital contingencies was  
important given uncertainty and asked whether going significantly below that would be  
problematic. Executive Director Zerwin stated that going significantly below could be  
troublesome because ETSB has finite revenue and cannot generate additional revenue like a  
business or PSAP that can charge members, so the fund must be managed differently. She noted  
surcharge  
revenue fluctuations of the past year of $1M and said maintenance contracts are significant.  
Vice Chair Franz stated the Board likely needs to consider an annual capital set-aside and asked  
how much money is currently in the fund now that radios are mostly paid. Executive Director  
Zerwin stated the Board is “right there” with what has been appropriated, referencing cash and  
investments and a long-term investment pool around $35M plus or minus, and said some funds  
would be drawn down for bill payments. She stated the remaining question mark is monthly  
surcharge performance, and while the estimate suggests the Board is at the target level,  
replacement costs remain uncertain.  
Vice Chair Franz stated the current approach may be overly conservative and could limit the  
ability to support PSAP needs. He discussed the need for a longer-term forecast and a yearly  
“true up,” and said the Board should know monthly how much is on hand. Executive Director  
Zerwin stated staff could begin showing that, noting treasurer reporting availability varies. Vice  
Chair Franz suggested that if the fund is over a target mid year, funds could be distributed  
through the IGA. Executive Director Zerwin stated the fund is specific to capital replacement and  
said she would not characterize it as overfunded, noting that if radios were included it would not  
be overfunded, and also noted that portions of long-term investments may need to be liquidated  
for cash flow as coordinated with the Treasurer’s Office. Vice Chair Franz stated that $35M  
relative to a $13M operating cash flow did not present a cash flow problem.  
Executive Director Zerwin responded that the Treasurer’s Office invests funds for return under  
statutory authority and cautioned against altering distribution assumptions until the State’s  
NG911 deployment costs are known, noting prior State disbursement amounts have decreased.  
She also clarified that revenue totals include reimbursements and are budget neutral, and noted  
ETSB bills in arrears. Vice Chair Franz stated he believed there remains excess funding after  
operating and capital obligations and said the Board needs to see clearly how that works to  
inform decisions.  
Chair Schwarze asked if there was any other discussion on Item 10. Hearing none, he called for a  
voice vote. On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye,” motion carried. Executive Director Zerwin  
stated the item was received and placed on file. Vice Chair Franz stated he did not agree the  
discussion was complete and said he had additional questions but added that if the Board would  
be discussing the topic regularly, the discussion could continue. Chair Schwarze stated it would.  
10.A. Revenue Report 911 Surcharge Funds  
10.A.1.  
ETSB Revenue Report for February 11 Regular Meeting for Fund 5820/Equalization  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
10.B. Budget Detail  
10.B.1.  
FY26 Expenditure vs Budget  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
10.B.2.  
Capital Contingencies Management Plan  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE  
Pat Johl  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
SECONDER:  
11.  
12.  
13.  
OLD BUSINESS  
There was no old business.  
NEW BUSINESS  
There was no new business.  
EXECUTIVE SESSION  
At 10:00am, a motion was made by Member Johl, seconded by Member Wolber, for ETSB to  
enter into Executive Session. On roll call, 9 Member voted "Ayes", 0 Members voted “Nay,” and  
3 Members were absent, motion carried. Pursuant to the carried vote, ETSB entered Executive  
Session.  
13.A. Minutes Review Pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2 (C) (21)  
13.A.1.March 10, 2021; October 9, 2024; June 14, 2025; July 9, 2025; August 13, 2025; and  
September 10, 2025.  
13.B. Personnel Matters Pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2 (C ) (1)  
13.C. Security Procedures and the Use of Personnel and Equipment Pursuant to 5 ILCS  
120/2 (C) (8)  
13.D. Pending Litigation Matters Pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2 (C) (11)  
14.  
MATTERS REFERRED FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION  
14.A. Disposition of Executive Session Minutes  
At 10:05am, the regular meeting of the ETSB reconvened. On roll call, Members Schwarze,  
Eckhoff, Franz, Hernandez, Johl, Maranowicz, McCarthy, Schar and Wolber were present.  
Chair Schwarze asked for a motion to release the minutes of September 10, 2025. Member  
Eckhoff motioned, seconded by Member Johl. On voice vote, all “Ayes”, motion carried.  
Chair Schwarze asked for a motion to retain the minutes of March 10, 2021, October 9, 2024,  
June 14, 2025, July 9, 2025 and August 13, 2025 as presented during Executive Session.  
Member Eckhoff motioned, seconded by Member Wolber. On voice vote, all “Ayes”, motion  
carried.  
15.  
ADJOURNMENT  
15.A. Next Meeting: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 at 9:00am in 3-500B  
Chair Schwarze asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion was made by Member Johl, seconded  
by Member Maranowicz. The meeting of the ETSB was adjourned at 10:06am.  
Respectfully submitted,  
Jean Kaczmarek