Paul Hoss explained, the Zoning Hearing Officer recommended to deny, due to the petitioner not
presenting a hardship or practical difficulty required for a variation. An adjacent neighbor had an
engineer present information on how the paver patio does create drainage issues on off site
properties. There is an opportunity to remove some of the bricks to have the 3 foot setback and
drainage easement, which would bring the patio into compliance.
WITHDRAWN
Liz Chaplin
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
Sheila Rutledge
Gustin
Chaplin, Rutledge, and Tornatore
Krajewski, and Ozog
NAY:
ABSENT:
6.G.
ZONING-23-000055 – Matthews: To approve the following bifurcated zoning relief:
1. Variation to allow a 6’/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 10’ corner side yard
setback
2. Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 30' front yard setback.
ZHO Recommendation to Approve
Development Committee VOTE (to Approve): 4 Ayes, 0 Nays, 2 Absent
3. Variation to increase the height of a fence within the required 25' line of sight/ vision
clearance on a corner from 3’ to approximately 6’. (Winfield/ District 6) (If the County
Board seeks to approve the zoning relief it will require a ¾ majority vote {14 votes} to
approve based on the recommendation to deny by the Zoning Hearing Officer)
ZHO Recommendation to Deny
Development Committee VOTE (Motion to Approve Failed): 0 Ayes, 4 Nays, 2 Absent
Attachments:
The Zoning Hearing Officer recommended to bifurcate the relief for this petition. He
recommended to approve 1 and 2 and deny 3.
Paul Hoss offered that the Township Road Commissioner, who has jurisdiction over Purnell
Road, did not object to the height of the fence, but had an objection to the line of sight easement.
Member Rutledge moved and Member Chaplin seconded 1.Variation to allow a 6’/100% closed
(privacy) fence within the 10’ corner side yard setback 2.Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed
(privacy) fence within the 30' front yard setback.All ayes, motion carried.
Member Gustin moved and Member Chaplin seconded 3.Variation to increase the height of a
fence within the required 25' line of sight/ vision clearance on a corner from 3’ to approximately
6’. All nays, motion failed.
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE
Sheila Rutledge
RESULT:
MOVER: