421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD  
WHEATON, IL 60187  
DU PAGE COUNTY  
ETSB - Ad Hoc Finance Committee  
Final Summary  
Wednesday, October 8, 2025  
8:00 AM  
Room 3500B  
Join Zoom Meeting  
Meeting ID: 831 2188 1663  
Passcode: 369388  
1.  
2.  
CALL TO ORDER  
8:00 AM meeting was called to order by Chair Schwarze at 8:03 AM.  
ROLL CALL  
ETSB STAFF:  
Linda Zerwin  
Gregg Taormina  
Eve Kraus  
Andres Gonzalez  
STATE'S ATTORNEY:  
Mark Winistorfer (8:28am)  
ATTENDEES:  
Nick Kottmeyer, County Board Office  
Evan Shields, County Board Office  
Jan Barbeau, State's Attorney's Office (Remote)  
Rachel Bata, Roselle PD (Remote)  
Anthony McPhearson, CIO (Remote)  
Kimberly White, DMMC (Remote)  
On roll call, Members Schwarze, Franz, Hernandez, Henry (8:24am), Honig (8:12am), Maranowicz,  
Robb, and Wolber were present.  
Schwarze, Franz, Hernandez, Maranowicz, Robb, and Wolber  
Henry, and Honig  
PRESENT  
LATE  
3.  
PUBLIC COMMENT  
There was no public comment.  
4.  
CHAIR'S REMARKS - CHAIR SCHWARZE  
Chair Schwarze thanked the Members for their presence and Executive Director Zerwin and staff  
for their hard work in preparing the FY26 budget.  
5.  
6.  
MEMBERS' REMARKS  
There were no Members' remarks.  
CONSENT ITEMS  
6.A.  
ETSB Ad Hoc Finance Minutes - Regular Meeting - Wednesday, June 11, 2025  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Kyle Wolber  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Jessica Robb  
SECONDER:  
6.B.  
ETSB Ad Hoc Finance Minutes - Regular Meeting - Wednesday, September 10, 2025  
On voice vote, all Members voted "Aye", motion carried.  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Jessica Robb  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Marilu Hernandez  
SECONDER:  
7.  
FY26 BUDGET  
7.A.  
Budget Presentation  
Executive Director Zerwin began the PowerPoint presentation with an overview of the  
proposed FY26 costs, utilizing the County format which provides a history of FY22-26,  
including:  
·
·
·
·
Total Appropriation of $48,988,966.  
Increase of approximately $1.4M from FY25, a 3% increase.  
Increase of 6% in operating costs.  
Decrease in new capital. When there is a new program, this is where the new capital  
will increase. Otherwise, there is just some standing capital costs like replacing the CAD  
or computers, etc.  
·
Capital Contingencies, the savings account, is basically funded, providing a life  
expectancy of 10 years.  
Executive Director Zerwin provided an explanation of the costs in each of the slides,  
attached to these minutes. She said a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) was  
included in Salaries as recommended by the County Board and that the mid-year salary  
adjustments were offset by vacancies in FY25. Discussion ensued around Operational  
costs for major components including battery lifecycle and replacement costs for the  
Police and Fire portable radios, projects such as the DeltaWRX RFP for CAD, the  
Hidden Lakes tower improvements, repair and maintenance of equipment, the decrease in  
communication services, and County licensing and cost sharing services including GIS.  
Member Honig entered the meeting at 8:12am.  
In terms of capital, Executive Director Zerwin reviewed upcoming costs of approximately  
$6.8M out of account 54199 to finish the radio replacement project and another $6.5M  
for the final payment on the original radio contract with Motorola. Vice Chair Franz  
questioned the capital funding moving forward. Executive Director Zerwin also  
reminded the Board there would be a $1.2M payment for the AXS console project, the  
third of six payments coming due. Vice Chair Franz questioned how we are going to  
budget for capital dollars going forward. He said, we did not really talk about revenue,  
stating he thought we have about $19 million. Our operating costs are about 13 million.  
So what do we need to set aside for capital every year on average? Because I am trying to  
get to the question of where are we with our reserves? Are we able to meet our demands,  
et cetera? Executive Director Zerwin replied, we do not typically carry reserve. You  
carry capital contingency for the replacement, that basically because this agency is 90%  
infrastructure. There are maintenance and capital replacements, and 8% on the personnel.  
She explained the reserves are monies to replace those major components. She said, we  
count only the monthly surcharge for the revenue projection because interest fluctuates.  
There is really no way to calculate that, especially in this market. Executive Director  
Zerwin reminded the Board there is about $30,000 annually in non-surcharge revenue  
from membership into the system and like agreements.  
Executive Director Zerwin moved on to the chart showing the 54199 Capital costs and  
their average life expectancy, which is usually based off the contract, and their respective  
replacement schedule. She explained that by dividing the cost by the life expectancy, and  
setting aside funds annually, we will reach the full replacement value at the time of the  
contract. And that even if money is saved by upgrading a system as opposed to replacing  
it, that does not negate the need to have full replacement dollars available when the Board  
decides to replace the system. Executive Director Zerwin explained that once a  
replacement is funded, the monies are carried over each year until it is done (financed),  
and that no additional funds are being set aside for a particular item. She said Baker  
Tilly, the outside auditors, set the funds up this way to allow for flexibility to move the  
funds when we need to pay the invoice and that at that time, there would be a dip is the  
reported dollars from the Treasurer. Executive Director Zerwin said there is about $16M  
in the money market fund and about $34M in long-term investments, but that there will  
be multiple large payments coming out in December and the Treasurer's Office will be  
moving money around to minimize any kind of major penalties in our investments.  
Treasurer Henry entered the meeting at 8:24am.  
Vice Chair Franz expressed frustration that he has I've been on this board 10 years and he  
still cannot make sense of that. That maybe his 30 years of doing budgets is insufficient  
enough. He asked if anybody else understands what that chart is because he does not  
understand what that means, and that the Board has to make some fundamental decisions  
every year. He said the IGA calls for us to decide how much to set aside for the PSAPs  
without better information and more time, which is no one's fault this year. It was a weird  
year. But that they cannot make that decision. Member Honig said he appreciates the  
chart. He said the job of ETSB is to provide infrastructure and support and that the  
money left over is going back into infrastructure and support, like the reserves for County  
Board which they can use as surplus funds for projects.  
Vice Chair Franz argued that the projections failed to show the 10-year capital outlook.  
He said if ETSB is not spending $22M, and only spending $450,000, then a plan should  
be put together based on a best guess of when equipment is going to be replaced and what  
is likely to be spent. He believed that if operating costs are $13.8M, and capital costs are  
$2M, in his view there is about $4M of revenue coming in that could be put in capital to  
try to do more, or provide more support to the PSAPs. Those are the conversations he  
believe need to be had.  
Member Maranowicz thought they would be shooting themselves in the foot projecting  
10 years out with technology changes; that he only projects 3 years.  
Discussion ensued around future years and the fluctuations of funds needed for  
replacement components, as well as projected revenue. Executive Director Zerwin  
referenced Chief Deputy Treasurer Smith's presentation from the August 13 meeting and  
the fact that for the first time in her 16 years with the ETSB that we would not make  
revenue projections in FY25 with a shortfall of approximately $1M. Discussion included  
why surcharge distribution is down and the potential use of the one-time NG9-1-1  
witholding from the State of around $1.6M. If those funds were utilized to supplant the  
surcharge shortage, then the remaining could either be used for a PSAP project request  
that was not budgeted for or it could distributed to the PSAPs as outlined in the budget  
memorandum. This discussion led to the expenditure policy adjustments which would be  
brought forward on the November agenda. One concern is that the $2M that Vice Chair  
Franz would like to see in the budget for distribution to the PSAPs would not be  
sustainable given the fact that surcharge is down.  
Consensus was taken on the following items:  
· To approve the Revenue projection for FY26 to $13M.  
· The CommsCoach interface request made by DU-COMM for FY25.  
· The RapidSOS Communicator suite of products to be brought forward for  
approval on the November board agenda.  
· To move forward on the recommendation to amend the Expenditure Policy  
regarding the use of one-time disbursements.  
· To approve the FY26 Appropriation on the ETS Board agenda as presented.  
Attachments:  
8.  
PARENT COMMITTEE APPROVAL REQUIRED  
8.A.  
Annual Appropriation Resolution for the Emergency Telephone System Board of  
DuPage, State of Illinois, for the Fiscal Period beginning December 1, 2025 and ending  
November 30, 2026.  
Chair Schwarze said he would like to have the FY26 budget approved at today's meeting.  
He asked for a motion to approve the annual appropriation for the ETSB. A motion was  
made by Member Maranowicz, seconded by Member Honig. On roll call, 6 Ayes, 1 Nay,  
to approve the budget on the following agenda.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Joseph Maranowicz  
Andrew Honig  
Schwarze, Hernandez, Honig, Maranowicz, Robb, and Wolber  
Franz  
NAY:  
9.  
OLD BUSINESS  
There was no old business.  
10.  
11.  
NEW BUSINESS  
There was no new business.  
ADJOURNMENT  
Without objection, the meeting of the ETSB Ad Hoc Finance Committee was adjourned at  
9:01am.