Jim Stran explained that a permit was issued in July, 2022. Prior to it being issued, a bond receipt
from Bloomingdale Townhsip was submitted by the applicant to obtain the permit. The
permitting process was delayed to litigation. Unbeknownst to the County the township bond had
expired, the permit was rescinded due to not meeting the requirement of either a waiver or
receipt of a paid bond. There was a hearing last November, to reconsider our position. The
County did not reissue the permit. Vertical Bridge has submitted a amended application asking to
re-evaluate our position based on the exception to section 112.6. Mr. Stran stated the County's
position is that this section would not apply to this permit, and denied the re-issue of the permit.
Melanie Chico, Counsel for Vertical Bridge presented their appeal. Her client leased land to
build a cell tower and needed to build a construction road from the cell tower site to Spring
Valley Drive and Glendale Road. The County revoked the permit, based on the lack of a
Township access permit. Initially the township had issued a permit and then changed positions,
after citizens had lost a lawsuit challenging the validity of the lease on the property. The
Township then claimed they owned the easement area where the access road was to be built. The
township advised Vertical Bridge they would need to enter into a lease with the Township,
which would be subject to a vote. Earlier this year the county updated their GIS maps, showing
this easement area is part of Lot 171, which Vertical Bridge is leasing. In March the Township,
though still claiming ownership of the easement, would allow the work, however they set some
conditions, including a $7,500 bond and that another route be used other then over this easement.
Vertical Bridge has asked that the County apply the exception based on these new developments.
She thanked the Committee for their consideration.
Jim Stran responded that the County is not taking a position on the ownership of Lot 171. Our
ordinance requires us to have a bond receipt or waiver issued by the authority having jurisdiction
over the right-of-way. The Township has not issued any document to the County. Assistant
State's Attorney Nicholas Alfonso referred to the Illinois Highway Code Section 9-113
supporting the County's decision.
Counsel rebutted, that the Township is no longer raising an issue with the right-of-way, so the
exception should apply.
A discussion ensued.
DEFEATED
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
NAY:
Sheila Rutledge
Liz Chaplin
Chaplin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore
Gustin, and Ozog
ABSENT:
15.
OLD BUSINESS
No old business was discussed.