421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD  
WHEATON, IL 60187  
DU PAGE COUNTY  
Development Committee  
Final Summary  
Tuesday, August 1, 2023  
10:30 AM  
ROOM 3500B  
1.  
2.  
CALL TO ORDER  
ROLL CALL  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
PRESENT  
ABSENT  
3.  
4.  
CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS- CHAIR TORNATORE  
Chair Tornatore reminded the Committee of the discussion about the County adopting a grass  
ordinance a few weeks ago. Counsel provided him with a copy of a provision in the County Code  
where the Board can provide for cutting of weeds in subdivisions. He added that essentially there  
is a mechanism in place and would leave it up to the Committee if there would be further  
discussion about a future ordinance.  
PUBLIC COMMENT  
Ray Shenudo spoke in support of Zoning Petition 23-000021 Malinin. He told the Committee  
they are not seeking to reduce the lot size, just the orientation. The reason for the variation is  
needed, because if divideded vertically instead of horizontally, it will create long, narrow lots,  
instead of more square shaped lots.  
Mike Roth, Attorney for JB Capital Management, LLC and spoke on behalf of petition  
23-000040. The matter received from the Zoning Board of Appeals, a unanimous  
recommendation to approve the petition. He shared that this is a legal non-conforming property  
and they are wanting to sell the two buildings to separate owners and this is the way to make this  
legal. The exceptions noted in the report are already existing conditions.  
Mike Zawislak spoke in support of the Malinin petition. The lots are configured in a east/west  
orientation and the petitioner is asking for the division to be configured north/south to create a  
more desirable, marketable lot for building a new home.  
The online submission for public comment from this Development Committee meeting are  
included for the record in their entirety. It can be found at the back of the minutes packet.  
5.  
MINUTES APPROVAL  
5.A.  
Development Committee - Regular Meeting - Tuesday, July 11, 2023  
APPROVED  
Attachments:  
RESULT:  
Brian Krajewski  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Liz Chaplin  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
6.  
REGULATORY SERVICES  
6.A.  
ZSE-23-000005 Abhyudaya Retreat Center Wedding: To approve the special event action  
item:  
A wedding ceremony and two (2) pre-wedding events to be held at the Abhyudaya  
Retreat Center on September 2, 2023 and September 3, 2023 for between 200-220 guests.  
(Downers Grove/ District 3) (Generally located northwest of Route 83 and Bluff Road)  
Attachments:  
APPROVED  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Liz Chaplin  
Brian Krajewski  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
6.B.  
ZONING-23-000021 – Malinin: To approve the following zoning relief:  
1. Variation to reduce the required lot width from required 165’ to approximately 145.3’  
for Lot 1 and 145.3 for Lot 2.  
2. Variation to reduce the required lot size from required 100,000 sq. ft. to approximately  
34,635 sq. ft. for Lot 1 and 34,632 sq. ft. for Lot 2. (Downers Grove/ District 3)  
(If the County Board seeks to approve the zoning relief it will require a ¾ majority vote  
{14 votes} to approve based on the recommendation to deny by the Zoning Hearing  
Officer)  
ZHO Recommendation to Deny  
Development Committee VOTE (to Approve): 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent  
Attachments:  
Member Krajewski received a call about this case and noted that similar cases have been  
approved before, so why the recommendation to deny? There was a concern raised from the  
Village of Burr Ridge that the developer was trying to avoid the Vine Street recapture fee, but  
was not opposed to the lot reconfiguration. Chair Tornatore added that the electronic comment  
received was from neighbors in opposition to this petition.  
Member Rutledge inquired if any previous zoning relief was granted on this property. Paul Hoss  
answered no and explained that when these lots were originally divided the zoning designation of  
R-1 did not exist. The lots are legal and buildable.They are historic lots of record and legal  
non-conforming. When the lots are reconfigured, they will lose that legal non-conforming  
designation and variations are required. The lot sizes are going to be the same, the lot widths are  
the same, they are going to be reconfigured, north and south. He added the hardship and practical  
difficulty on these lots is the vacant lot to the north, it is heavily wooded and has a rise of about 7  
feet. By reconfiguring the lots north to south, they will have a more buildable lot for a new home.  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Brian Krajewski  
Liz Chaplin  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
6.C.  
ZONING-23-000028 – Catie’s Place, LLC.: To approve the following zoning relief:  
Variation to reduce the required parking spaces for a Class A Restaurant from 19 parking  
spaces to 10 parking spaces. (York/District 2) (If the County Board seeks to approve the  
zoning relief it will require a ¾ majority vote {14 votes} to approve based on the  
recommendation to deny by the Zoning Board of Appeals)  
ZBA VOTE (to Deny): 4 Ayes, 2 Nays, 1 Absent  
Development Committee VOTE (Motion to Approve Failed): 0 Ayes, 5 Nays, 1 Absent  
Attachments:  
Paul Hoss explained that the County defaults to the state laws for video gaming establishments,  
which requires a liquor license. The petitioner presented they will operate a Class A restaurant  
with video gaming and that the other businesses in the strip mall close by 6-7 p.m. This would  
free up parking spaces in the evening, but technically they don't meet the parking regulations.  
The ZBA recognized that if the gaming establishment closed and another Class A restaurant  
moved in, they would most likely not operate as the video gaming establishment did.  
Chair Tornatore pointed out that a variation runs with the land and could impact future  
businesses in this strip mall. There is the another possibility of the petitioner asking for a  
conditional use, for just gaming establishments.  
DEFERRED  
Liz Chaplin  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Sheila Rutledge  
SECONDER:  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
NAY:  
ABSENT:  
6.D.  
ZONING-23-000030 – Bakas: To approve the following zoning relief:  
Variation to allow a 6'/100% closed (privacy) fence within the 10' corner side yard  
setback. (Lisle/District 2)  
ZHO Recommendation to Approve  
Development Committee VOTE (to Approve): 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent  
Attachments:  
Member Chaplin, stated she is concerned about corner properties having 100% closed fences,  
causing blind spots. Mr. Hoss referred Committee Members to a map inside the packet. After  
explaining the unusual set up for the subject property and the property behind it, Members could  
see there was no line of sight issue.  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Brian Krajewski  
Patty Gustin  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
6.E.  
ZONING-23-000031 – Eiternick: To approve the following zoning relief:  
Conditional Use to allow existing deck structure to remain less than 3 feet (approximately  
1 foot) from the interior side property line, where it has existed for at least 5 years.  
(Addison/ District 1)  
ZHO Recommendation to Approve  
Development Committee VOTE (to Approve): 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent  
Attachments:  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Patty Gustin  
Liz Chaplin  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
6.F.  
ZONING-23-000040 – JB Capital Management, LLC.: To approve the following zoning  
relief:  
Conditional Use with exceptions for the existing buildings and improvements:  
1. Exception from 40’ required front yard setback from Jeans Road (widened in 1992) on  
proposed Lot 1 to approximately 0’.  
2. Exception from 20’ required rear yard setback on proposed Lot 1 to approximately  
14.53’.  
3. Exception to allow parking in existing 40’ corner side yard on proposed Lot 1.  
4. Exception to allow parking in existing 20’ interior side yard on proposed Lot 1.  
5. Exception from 20’ required interior side yard setback on proposed Lot 2 to  
approximately 16.12’.  
6. Exception from 20’ required interior side yard setback on proposed Lot 2 to  
approximately 15’. (Downers Grove/ District 3)  
ZBA VOTE (to Approve): 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, 2 Absent  
Development Committee VOTE (to Approve): 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent  
Attachments:  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
AYES:  
Sheila Rutledge  
Liz Chaplin  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
ABSENT:  
8.  
OLD BUSINESS  
No old business was discussed.  
8.  
NEW BUSINESS  
No new business was discussed.  
10.  
ADJOURNMENT  
Motion was made by Vice-Chair Rutledge, seconded by Member Chaplin and without objection  
the Development Committee meeting was adjourned at 11:22 a.m.  
11.  
ROLL CALL  
Chaplin, Gustin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Ozog  
PRESENT  
ABSENT  
12.  
13.  
14.  
CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS- CHAIR TORNATORE  
Chair Tornatore went over the procedures of the hearing and informed the Committee Members  
that there was a previous appeal hearing on this permit last year.  
PUBLIC COMMENT  
No public comments were offered.  
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING  
Jim Stran explained that a permit was issued in July, 2022. Prior to it being issued, a bond receipt  
from Bloomingdale Townhsip was submitted by the applicant to obtain the permit. The  
permitting process was delayed to litigation. Unbeknownst to the County the township bond had  
expired, the permit was rescinded due to not meeting the requirement of either a waiver or  
receipt of a paid bond. There was a hearing last November, to reconsider our position. The  
County did not reissue the permit. Vertical Bridge has submitted a amended application asking to  
re-evaluate our position based on the exception to section 112.6. Mr. Stran stated the County's  
position is that this section would not apply to this permit, and denied the re-issue of the permit.  
Melanie Chico, Counsel for Vertical Bridge presented their appeal. Her client leased land to  
build a cell tower and needed to build a construction road from the cell tower site to Spring  
Valley Drive and Glendale Road. The County revoked the permit, based on the lack of a  
Township access permit. Initially the township had issued a permit and then changed positions,  
after citizens had lost a lawsuit challenging the validity of the lease on the property. The  
Township then claimed they owned the easement area where the access road was to be built. The  
township advised Vertical Bridge they would need to enter into a lease with the Township,  
which would be subject to a vote. Earlier this year the county updated their GIS maps, showing  
this easement area is part of Lot 171, which Vertical Bridge is leasing. In March the Township,  
though still claiming ownership of the easement, would allow the work, however they set some  
conditions, including a $7,500 bond and that another route be used other then over this easement.  
Vertical Bridge has asked that the County apply the exception based on these new developments.  
She thanked the Committee for their consideration.  
Jim Stran responded that the County is not taking a position on the ownership of Lot 171. Our  
ordinance requires us to have a bond receipt or waiver issued by the authority having jurisdiction  
over the right-of-way. The Township has not issued any document to the County. Assistant  
State's Attorney Nicholas Alfonso referred to the Illinois Highway Code Section 9-113  
supporting the County's decision.  
Counsel rebutted, that the Township is no longer raising an issue with the right-of-way, so the  
exception should apply.  
A discussion ensued.  
DEFEATED  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
NAY:  
Sheila Rutledge  
Liz Chaplin  
Chaplin, Krajewski, Rutledge, and Tornatore  
Gustin, and Ozog  
ABSENT:  
15.  
OLD BUSINESS  
No old business was discussed.  
16.  
17.  
NEW BUSINESS  
No new business was discussed.  
ADJOURNMENT  
With no further business, the Building Board of Appeals meeting was adjourned at 11:42 a.m.