many outside agencies already used Starcom equipment and asked if the policy required
Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) radios. Ms. Zerwin said the application asks if
radios are TDMA and have Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption, and said
agencies need to show Starcom membership. She said not all Starcom members have
TDMA radios. Vice Chair Clark said it was important to have fewer Frequency Division
Multiple Access (FDMA) units to avoid clogging up the system. Ms. Zerwin said some
radios, like DEDIR System fire radios, were not TDMA yet.
Member Benjamin asked whether the language of the actual policy was brought to focus
groups. Ms. Zerwin said they did not directly discuss policy in focus groups preferring to
discuss concepts instead and incorporate feedback at the PAC level. Member Benjamin
said he was concerned about not being an expert on how the policies interact with
technology and had counted on focus groups for that input.
Vice Chair Clark asked if they needed to approve the policy soon or incorporate changes
first. Chair Selvik said sooner would be better since focus groups were not the right
setting for reviewing policies. He added that they could always bring it back and fix
issues later.
Member Benjamin asked about the purpose of focus groups if they could not discuss
policy. Chair Selvik said they were operational, focused on talk groups, templates, and
encryption. Member Benjamin questioned how deciding who gets keys was not a policy
decision. Ms. Zerwin and Chair Selvik said it was operational. Vice Chair Clark said
focus groups provide operational guidance for policy but do not make it. During the
discussion, Chair Selvik suggested Member Benjamin ask Eric Maplethorpe to weigh in.
Mr. Maplethorpe said he did not want to comment at that time and recommended talking
to Member Benjamin privately about the operational aspects for PSAP personnel.
Member Benjamin said his agency does not monitor the DUCALL talk group and their
room is too busy during major incidents to expect telecommunicators to monitor and
patch themselves. Ms. Zerwin said the DUCALL language had been in the policy since
December 2023, she said it was concerning that a policy in place since December 2023
had been ignored. Ms. Zerwin said tabling the policy would not remove the DUCALL
language from the current policy. Vice Chair Clark said he preferred to move forward
with the changes they had discussed and address additional amendments later, rather than
holding up improvements to sharing talk groups. Member Benjamin maintained his
motion to table because he had not had time to review thoroughly.
Chair Selvik called for a roll call vote on the motion to recommend approval to the ETS
Board as discussed and amended. On roll call with four “Ayes” and one “Nay” to
recommend approval to the ETS Board, motion carried. Member Benjamin expressed
appreciation for the discussion, and Chair Selvik thanked everyone for their comments
and indicated willingness to entertain further concerns in the future.