421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD  
WHEATON, IL 60187  
DU PAGE COUNTY  
ETSB - Policy Advisory Committee  
Final Summary  
Monday, June 2, 2025  
8:15 AM  
Room 3500A  
Join Zoom Meeting  
Meeting ID: 832 2068 0840  
Passcode: 054391  
1.  
2.  
CALL TO ORDER  
8:15 AM meeting was called to order by Chair Selvik, Member Fluery arrived at 8:17 AM.  
ROLL CALL  
Attendees:  
Linda Zerwin, DuPage Emergency Telephone System Board, non-voting Member  
Gregg Taormina, DuPage Emergency Telephone System Board (Remote)  
Eve Kraus, DuPage Emergency Telephone System Board (Remote)  
Andres Gonzalez, DuPage Emergency Telephone System Board  
Jan Barbeau, State’s Attorney’s Office (Remote)  
Michael Rodriguez, Lisle PD (Remote)  
Craig Gomorczak, Lisle PD (Remote)  
Marilu Hernandez, ACDC (Remote)  
Erik Maplethorpe, DU-COMM (Remote)  
Jim McGreal, Downers Grove PD (Remote)  
Alison Murphy, DMMC (Remote)  
Bob Murr, COD (Remote)  
Tom Gallahue, ILEAS (Remote)  
Jim Connolly, Village of Addison (Remote)  
On roll call, Members Benjamin, Burmeister, Clark, Fleury, Jansen and Selvik were present,  
which constituted a quorum.  
Selvik, Benjamin, Burmeister, Clark, Fleury, and Jansen  
PRESENT  
3.  
4.  
5.  
PUBLIC COMMENT  
There was no public comment.  
CHAIR'S REMARKS - CHAIR SELVIK  
There were no remarks from Chair Selvik.  
MEMBERS' REMARKS  
There were no Members' remarks.  
6.  
CONSENT ITEMS  
6.A.  
DEDIR System May Maintainer Report  
On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion carried.  
Attachments:  
ACCEPTED AND PLACED ON FILE  
Chris Clark  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
Eric Burmeister  
6.B.  
ETSB PAC Minutes - Regular Meeting - Monday, May 5, 2025  
On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye”, motion carried.  
Attachments:  
ETSB RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE  
Eric Burmeister  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Craig Jansen  
SECONDER:  
7.  
PARENT COMMITTEE APPROVAL REQUIRED  
7.A.  
Resolution to approve Policy 911-005.2: Access to the DuPage Emergency Dispatch  
Interoperable Radio System (DEDIR System). (PAC Recommendation to approve: 6  
Ayes, 0 Nays)  
Vice Chair Clark made a motion to recommend approval to the ETS Board, seconded by  
Member Burmeister. Chair Selvik opened the item for discussion.  
Member Benjamin said he wanted to discuss the purpose of the recent changes and asked  
what the purpose of these changes was, since Policy 911-005.2 had just been changed  
three weeks earlier. Chair Selvik said the changes were mainly to clean up language about  
who was monitoring DUCALL. Vice Chair Clark said he read it the same way. Chair  
Selvik said last month it was discussed that DU-COMM is not monitoring DUCALL, and  
Member Benjamin said they do not. Chair Selvik said the changes are to clarify that  
DUCALL would be specific to ACDC agencies and to address language cleanup  
recommended by Assistant State's Attorney Winistorfer.  
Ms. Zerwin said that in reviewing Policy 911-005.2 at the May 14, 2025, ETS Board  
meeting, Member Robb asked for changes on the floor, but other paragraphs in the policy  
had language that did not match the intent and have been amended, so this revision aims  
to make Policy 911-005.2 consistent with what Member Robb asked to be changed. Ms.  
Zerwin said that in the InterOp Talk Groups section, language that should have been  
struck remained, so it was cleaned up. Ms. Zerwin said ACDC clarified in conversations  
that it would only monitor ACDC agencies, and Assistant State’s Attorney Winistorfer  
made further changes for clarity and flow, including moving the Application  
Modification section to the end of the Application Process.  
Ms. Zerwin said these changes are meant to make the Policy 911-005.2 consistent with  
what she and ASA Winistorfer believed was Member Robb's original intent and to  
address ACDC's request. Ms. Zerwin referred to a Memorandum sent to PAC Members  
and said with respect to the recommendations, that since the phone numbers were in the  
Policy as a secondary form of contact, that information should be included directly on the  
application form, as applicants will need easy access to the number if that will be the  
process.  
Chair Selvik asked if that answered Member Benjamin’s question, and Member  
Benjamin said it did. He asked if anything besides DUCALL and patching was being  
changed, and Chair Selvik said the rest was just cleanup and addressing phone numbers.  
Member Benjamin said the memo mentioned clarifying the talk groups name change  
transition and asked what that was related to. Ms. Zerwin said ASA Winistorfer  
recommended adding language to the Policy to clarify the transition timeline, since  
DUCALL is not currently active and the talk group currently operates under a different  
name. She said the changes aim to avoid future revisions by establishing that, once  
implemented, the new name will take effect moving forward.  
Member Benjamin asked if the Focus Group’s operational recommendations and current  
talk group names were included in the spreadsheets. Ms. Zerwin said yes, the  
spreadsheets showed both current and future names. She said now that the Policy was  
shifting to a more open approach, agencies would need to know both names during the  
transition. Ms. Zerwin said agencies might label the talk groups differently on their  
radios, but the spreadsheets would help them match the old and new names.  
Member Fleury asked why DU-COMM did not use DUCALL. Member Benjamin said  
they could not commit to monitoring it 24/7 due to staffing and workflow. Member  
Fleury asked if anything could be done to improve the workflow. Member Benjamin said  
that during large incidents, it is not practical to monitor a separate channel, and that  
communication is usually handled by dispatchers over the phone rather than trying to  
solve problems on a radio channel. He said he saw the value of DUCALL but do not have  
the staff or workflow for it.  
Member Fleury asked how ACDC would handle it, and Member Burmeister said they  
would add it like another channel and set it to scan. Vice Chair Clark said the purpose of  
the Hailing channel was to assign InterOp channels, not to call for help, and that this  
could also be done by phone. Member Benjamin said actual incidents would not take  
place on DUCALL, but it would be used to request patches or information. Chair Selvik  
said for their agency, requests were usually handled by phone, and monitoring DUCALL  
was not a big task for ACDC. Vice Chair Clark and Member Burmeister said the main  
benefit was for outside agencies. Member Benjamin said the main purpose was to give  
outside agencies a way to access DEDIRS channels by calling on DUCALL, but  
DU-COMM was not set up for that.  
Member Fleury compared it to KaneCall, which was used as an emergency channel by  
everyone in Kane County, and said he had assumed DUCALL worked the same way, but  
it did not.  
Member Benjamin asked if the changes to the Application Modification section were  
substantive or just reorganization. Ms. Zerwin said there were a few word changes but  
nothing substantive, and most changes were just moving text for clarity. She said some  
lines were moved to different parts of the section, and the Assistant State’s Attorney  
deleted and moved sentences for better organization. She reviewed the changes for the  
Committee.  
Member Benjamin said he had no further questions. Chair Selvik asked if there were any  
other questions about the Policy revision, then said there was a motion and a second and  
called for a vote on the changes.  
On voice vote, all Members voted “Aye” to recommend approval to the ETS Board,  
motion carried.  
Attachments:  
APPROVED AT COMMITTEE  
Eric Burmeister  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Chris Clark  
SECONDER:  
DEDIR SYSTEM  
8.  
8.A.  
June DEDIR System Update  
Ms. Zerwin said that ETSB has all the keys except for the one for Hodgkin's, because  
some of the Police agencies that shared the key were resistant. She said they would move  
forward without it and leave space for it, so they could keep going. She said they hoped  
to get a copy of the encryption plan to review this week and offered to take any questions.  
Vice Chair Clark asked about the status of the KMF that Motorola was providing, and  
Ms. Zerwin said she did not have any information about it because Andy, the radio  
service manager, was on vacation last week. She said she would check and let them  
know. Member Benjamin asked who the plan would go to for review and if another  
review was needed. Ms. Zerwin said it would be a new document and would be a first  
review. When asked again who would review it, she said she did not know yet because  
she had not seen it and did not know what kind of review it would need, or if it would  
need a Tech Focus Group review etc. Chair Selvik said he thought they would have the  
document hopefully this week.  
Attachments:  
8.B. Police  
Chair Selvik said there had been no Police Focus Group meeting and no additional updates on  
the police side. He said they were waiting on the encryption plan.  
8.C. Fire  
Vice Chair Clark said template testing was underway and that the addition of encryption keys  
would allow for more complete testing of some State channels.  
9.  
OLD BUSINESS  
Chief Selvik asked if there was any old business. Ms. Zerwin said that changes to the talk groups  
on the MOU with Lyons Township Area Communications Center (LTACC) came though after  
the agenda was posted and she wanted to present it to the PAC Members. She said LTACC had  
made some adjustments to their talk groups compared to what the agreement has, and she said  
the members received that information as a secondary email from Andres. She noted that  
LTACC is removing certain talk groups from availability. She said the changes would have to  
go through the process and be on the agenda next month. However, she said that to avoid delays,  
if there was no objection, staff could remove the tactical channels now to keep the programming  
going and finalize everything next month. Chief Selvik said that sounded good and asked if there  
were any objections or questions. Nobody opposed. He said he thought they were good. Ms.  
Zerwin said that another option was that she had signing power in the Policy and the changes  
could be affirmed through the ETS Board by putting it on the agenda next week, if there were no  
objections. Chief Selvik asked if anyone had an issue with that, and when no one objected, he  
said they were all good. Ms. Zerwin said they would then put it on for the next week ETS Board  
Meeting and move forward.  
10.  
11.  
NEW BUSINESS  
There was no new business.  
ADJOURNMENT  
11.A. Next Meeting: Monday, July 7 at 8:15am in Room 3-500A  
Member Benjamin made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:40am, seconded by Member  
Fleury. On voice vote, motion carried.  
Respectfully submitted,  
Andres Gonzalez