Dupage Logo
To view previous Board or Committee Meetings, please visit our YouTube channel.
Those wishing to submit virtual public comments, please use the Public Comment Form.
File #: DC-O-0027-24    Version: 1
Type: Development Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 4/8/2024 In control: Development Committee
On agenda: 4/16/2024 Final action: 4/23/2024
Title: Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000013 CTLTC #8002391179
Attachments: 1. Z-24-000013 CTLTC #8002391179 Cty. Bd. (04-23-2024)_Redacted.pdf

title
Zoning Petition ZONING-24-000013 CTLTC #8002391179
resolution


WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 13, 2024 in the DuPage County Administration Building, 421 North County Farm Road, Wheaton, Illinois at 2:30 P.M. before the DuPage County Zoning Hearing Officer and notice of said hearing was duly given; and

WHEREAS, a petition was presented at this hearing requesting the following zoning relief:

Conditional Use to reduce the interior setback of an existing fence from 3" to approximately 0" for an existing fence post on the property line, on the property hereinafter described:

LOT 13 IN BLOCK 3 IN TRI-STATE VILLAGE, A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING SOUTH OF JOLIET ROAD, OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1939 AS DOCUMENT NO 405534, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and

WHEREAS, the Zoning Hearing Officer, having considered in relation to the above requested zoning petition presented at the above hearing and at the recommendation meeting held on March 13, 2024 does find as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. That petitioner testified that the subject zoning relief is to allow an existing fence from 3" to approximately 0" for an existing fence post on the property line.

B. That petitioner originally applied for a Variation for the subject zoning relief, and that the request was converted to a Conditional use at the public hearing, as a Conditional Use is lesser zoning relief than a Variation, and that conditions can therefore be placed on the subject fence to mitigate any future impacts on adjacent properties.

C. That petitioner testified that he purchased the subject property less than one (1) year ago, and that petitioner installed the composite fence to the property line, as he was required to fu...

Click here for full text